Lessons From the Core Shed
Core sheds fail in predictable ways. The failure rarely…
Read More
→
Report Date: 2026-01-21
On active mine sites, trust is not a value statement. It is an operating condition.
It determines how quickly crews respond to changing ground, how honestly risk is reported, and whether decisions hold through fatigue, rotation, and pressure. When trust fails, systems fail quietly first.
Operating truth: Trust on site is not built by intent. It is built by decisions that survive handover.
Trust starts at handover, not introductions
Trust does not begin when someone mobilises. It begins with the first handover they inherit.
If the incoming crew can see what is open, what is changing, and what is unresolved, continuity holds. If information is verbal-only or incomplete, risk transfers silently between swings.
Rock Force treats handover as a system. Written logs, verbal walkthroughs, and physical checks are enforced together. None of them are optional.
The ground does not care who worked the previous shift. It only reflects what was done and what was missed.
What gets logged gets owned
Logging is not about visibility. It is about ownership.
When hazards, actions, and decisions carry names and timestamps, responsibility becomes explicit. When they do not, ownership drifts until something breaks.
| Logging condition | Immediate effect | Trust outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Named owner and close-out condition | Clear accountability | Trust compounds across swings |
| Generic notes or verbal-only | Ambiguity at handover | Trust erodes quietly |
| Unresolved items persist | Risk accumulates | Crews stop reporting early |
Trust builds when the same names consistently close the same classes of issues. It collapses when unresolved items linger without consequence.
Ground control decisions: who signs, who acts
Ground control is where trust becomes measurable.
Crews observe who is authorised to make decisions, who actually makes them, and whether those decisions hold in the field. Trigger action response plans only work if authority is unambiguous.
Rule: One person signs. One person acts. Everyone else works to that decision until conditions change.
Rock Force assigns clear decision authority for ground-related calls and backs it with site presence. When a trigger is met, the response is executed, logged, and held.
Stop-work without theatre
A stop-work call is the fastest way to test trust.
Clean stops are calm, immediate, and supported. Work pauses. The area is made safe. The decision is logged. No production debate plays out on the radio.
| Stop-work behaviour | What crews learn | Reporting outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate, supported stop | Decisions are real | Issues continue to be raised |
| Debated or delayed stop | Production overrides safety | Issues go unreported |
When stops are predictable and boring, people keep reporting. When every stop becomes a negotiation, they stop speaking up.
Continuity through fatigue and rotation
Fatigue does not cause dramatic failure. It causes erosion.
Late in swing, documentation thins and assumptions go unchallenged. Trust holds only if systems compensate for this decline.
Rock Force designs site systems that do not rely on memory or goodwill. Checklists, sign-offs, and physical verification matter most when people are tired.
Re-entry after a miss or change
Trust is rarely lost during steady operations. It is lost during change.
After a miss, weather event, or ground movement, re-entry discipline is visible to everyone. Conditions are reassessed. Controls are revalidated. Authority is reasserted before work resumes.
Sites that rush re-entry to recover time spend longer rebuilding trust.
What to audit next
If you want to understand the real trust level on your site, do not ask about culture.
Audit your last three handovers. Review the last stop-work call. Check whether ground control decisions would hold at the end of swing.
Trust on site is not a statement. It is the residue of decisions that survive pressure, repetition, and time.
